Thanks Stony. Never thought I'd need to vindicated on a forum I've been a member of for 6+ yrs. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> Nonetheless I don't have much to say for the mighy Mitsu that I haven't already contributed. I don't have much to ask either - my beast is running fine and in its final state

...well that's not true. Smacks booster in the works - Based on the current level of skepticism concerning reality I'm sure I'll get 'smack' conspiracy claims that I'm in doing it to 'disrupt society', start a political party, or somehow deviously make money off an open source, howbeit completely bogus, design <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> ...But I'll be sure to post my results to maintain my worthiness of this board's membership. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

Agree to disagree is fine Grasscat - but I hope somewhere down the road when things are much further down the crapper that my attempt to plant a seed of doubt regarding the largely fictitious left/right paradigm and all the misappropriated allegiance and support of neo-fascist, socialistic, imperialistic policies that goes with it will strike some chord of remembrance. Then its worth all the flaming (and it certainly isn't just here) I'm bound to receive:

ôWhenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government;à whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights.ö

-Thomas Jefferson



Sigh...

I couldn't help but notice you had no response for the testimony of witnesses closest to a plane that we are told - hit the light poles, the building, and incinerated everything except the victims
...nor the diametrically opposing data of the FAA vs. the NTSB flight paths
...nor the fact the FDR put the plane at 400 ft above the Pentagon at the impact point
...nor the testimony of FAA director Norman Mineta
...nor the testimony of April Gallup, who walked out of the impact hole with her son
...nor the fact that Hanjour couldn't even check out in a 172 for lack of piloting skills
...nor the testimony of Barry Jennings
...nor the testimony of Scott Forbes
...nor the fact that the administration directly changed the EPA statement regarding ground zero air quality to one of no cause for concern - lies which have mortally affected the health and life of 50,000 rescue and cleanup workers
...nor the fact that half of the victims families believe 9-11 was an inside job
...nor the laughable contradictions of the NIST's report regarding the fires which miraculously caused only the third collapse of a steel framed skyscraper in history - the first two being WTC 1&2.
...nor the fact that shoot down orders were changed 4 months prior to the event and rescinded afterwards
...nor why the 'science' of the FL 77's crash is depicted sans two 6 ton engines and a tail fin that enters a building intact.
...nor a simple rational reason why citizens of the United States are forbidden from seeing the visual evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon from over 85 surveillance tapes CONFISCATED.

Get back to me on those and I'll be happy to waste my time with this 'musing'. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/sleeping.gif" alt="" />

The deeper into this stuff I peer, the funnier it gets:

Pop Mechanics 'factchecker' doofus ...s on the Charles Goyette show - MP3 file