Quote
That there is no evidence of a 757 smoldering inside the pentagon is not a claim that I know where the plane is - it is a refutation of your claim.


No, it's a failure to believe the government and most of the eye-witnesses without sufficient counter-evidence as proof that the claim is incorrect. You are the one bringing the charge and must prove your theory to the extent that sufficient and rational evidence is presented to call into question the defendant's veracity.... which you haven't done and can't do.

Quote
I never said the FAA radar data is infallibly accurate - I said it supports the testimony of 13 independently interviewed witness who were unanimous in their account. Based on that - it appears the radar data could be accurate - is that unreasonable?


Here's what you also said:

Quote
When we look at the data and communications regarding this animation of the plane flying in north of the Citgo we find that this data is compiled from no less than four separate Radar TERMINAL APPROACH CONTROLS. These systems triangulate through multiple radars as well as transpond data between the aircraft and radars. Why? Because the system has to be accurate. Why? Because it is the key feature for regulating inbound aircraft and blending new incoming flights into the approach pattern.


Then:

Quote
Of course you can't even touch the NTSB data - because it is irrefutable - THE FLIGHT DATA RECORDER information puts the plane at 400 ft above the Pentagon at its impact point. This isn't 'radar clutter'. Its gathered from onboard systems including altimeter.


Sounds like you think it's the "word".

Now, since you didn't understand how radar works, you probably aren't terribly interested in altimeters, either - except to once again accept anything sufficiently beyond understanding.... as magic, sleight-of-hand or infallible because it's in a "black box". Guess what? Altimeters can lie to you if you don't properly adjust them for the correct barometric pressure. According to some things I've read, the NTSB didn't adjust the pressure correction on the FDR altimeter readout for the data that some have said showed the plane at 480' at the time of impact. Maybe this can explain it to you better than I can:

web page

You say the North of Citgo Gang are in unanimous agreement:

Quote
.....13 people independently interviewed and unanimous in their account is a death blow of evidence contrary to the claim that the plane flew south of the Citgo.


.........like that's the only story line:

Debunking the North of Citgo Theory



Quote
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't recall seeing that on your site - you didn't actually lie to him, did you? Not a Truther.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Yes, you got me. Because its not on my own site - I must be lying. ...


Thought so - thanks for confirming it. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/kewl.gif" alt="" />

Frank <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" />

'89 [color:"white"]G-Raider[color:"white"] [color:"black"]Supercharged 3.0L, MegaSquirt 2, lockup A/T, 2.5" exhaust, 172k, Cibie H4s/Oscar SCs, Hella Micro DE fogs, Cobra CB, Superwinch hubs, LSD rear/Aussie Locker front, Bilsteins, Lifeline AGM, Rust-Oleum