That goofy fellow should be ashamed of himself.... trying to confuse poor ol' Lloyd. And Lloyd's wife is a trip - an expert witness who wasn't at the scene, but becomes a cornerstone of "factual" information "proving" the Truthers case that the entire event was planned. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />



No, the FDR likely worked until impact, but latency in the data being written to the recorder made it appear that it quit 1-2 seconds sooner.



I don't think so....... The government reconstruction was not a real-time view of the instruments - it was a simulation. Do you know whether the altimeter data was derived from the pressure altimeter or the radio altimeter? I don't. Either could have been in error - particularly the radio altimeter in a diving bank and both are likely to show deviation due to electronic latency. Have you checked any other black box data to show what the data read at impact as a result of a diving/banking crash. Was the pressure altimeter correctly calibrated? Was the radio altimeter correctly calibrated?



That means nothing. My son-in-law couldn't check out a Cessna 172 a couple of years ago - even though he had recently accumulated 4000 hours in USN EP3-E model multi-engine surveillance aircraft:


and a few thousand more hours as a flight instructor in a T-34C:


If you haven't been checked out in a plane, you don't get to fly it.... but you know that.



You're reading that from the wrong angle..... since you seem to have all of the "facts" - most all of which are completely irrelevent.



Oh boy........ now you're going into orbit...... put down the crack pipe.

1) Where's the disclaimer from Rolls Royce?

2) Where's the plane?

I'll get back to you when you can answer those 2 questions.

Frank <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/sleeping.gif" alt="" />