That's real cute, linking to pictures that aren't relevent. Show me the "EXIT" sign in this picture:


That is in this picture:


Since the second picture is taken from a closer range, the "EXIT" sign should be clearly visible in the first picture. Where is it?



Oh yes - the tower.... the one you called a VOR tower here:


But is now a VDOT tower - big difference.

Actually, there is quite a bit of confusion about this - is it the VDOT antenna that is the concern?


Or this mast next to the overhead sign?


Since you said that you could see a tower in the path, I assume you meant the mast - which appears to have been struck by a wingtip - maybe, maybe not.

If you meant the VDOT antenna tower, then that's a different thing.

Here's a discussion regarding the VDOT tower and whether it was possible to fly the airplane into the Pentagon, yet not hit the VDOT tower. If you want to do the math for yourself, be prepared to determine a parabolic flight path from the FDR that has a lag due to latency - and then calculate the airborne position of the aircraft's parabolic path (including any banking maneuver) over an exact geographic track using the FDR info (with latency). You'll also need to calculate generated G-Force and determine if the aircraft could have remained assembled and if the pilot could have remained concious. The calculations are quite complex without accurate data, but if you want to find the answer, you need to read this and see for yourself:

web page

Where is that statement from Rolls Royce?
Where is the plane?
Who photochopped the pictures?

Frank