Contemplate this. Within 30 mins of the first plane striking the towers we had government 'experts' in every MSM interview chair telling us OBL did it while images of the towers crumbling - a first in the history of steel skyscrapers - were replayed over, and over, and over and over...for days after. Its old school mind warfare, like everyone else I fell for it too. But what is incredible to me is how steadfast some will stand entrenched in a false reality no matter how many holes are in the sack put over their head.

We find this for WMD's as well. If it wasn't so sad it would be hysterical. This is what they (tyrants) do - since Nero burned Rome and blamed it on the Christians.

But what is just pathetic is when alternative evidence is presented - then 'conspiracy theory' - the very thing railed against in regards to a very problematic story - is not only acceptable, but immediately plausible. But this shouldn't be confused with how I, or anyone else came to the conclusion that its an inside job. As I've said before, it was years before the examination of evidence became so overwhelming there is no other possible conclusion.

Of course its entirely inconceivable that leaders at the very top of government could ever conceive of such an idea to bring about an agenda - but they did...but then when facts are presented its 'irrelevant.' We won't even examine the Downing Street memo that advocates the exact same premise (a self inflicted wound for the purpose of gaining public consensus and support), or the more recent accounts by executive branch insiders of Cheney's ideas for kick-starting an Iranian conflict (painting up boats in Iranian markings and having them fire on American ships), or the Gulf of Tonkin, or the sinking of the Maine, the attack of the USS Liberty (hell you can read that one right on the NSA's own website) or, as has been recently exposed in the National Archives - Pearl Harbor (an event proactively allowed to happen).

No, no no - but a sloppy glance at a photo: "Photoshopped"...by a couple of guys seeking the rest of the story that our government refuses to give us. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />

So here is it is:

The photo perspective - no conspiracy. Marker at bottom is where first photo was taken. Marker above that was were the photos with the obstructed sign were taken. Next marker is where the last photos were taken where the pole is visible. Green marker is location of sign. Circle is the obstructing tree.


Overhead view. Exif data for the shot is by a Nikon Coolpix - shot at 200mm equiv zoom - which is why there is no depth of field. And there's no editing in the exif data history...


So I've wasted my time - now someone explain to me how a time stamp on the Citgo 'Doubletree' video reverses. And why/what was the dude in the scene looking at in the sky while the Pentagon has just blown up behind him?

Maybe Roosevelt Roberts Jr. has your answer.

...



as I said previously: "Yes he was walking down a hill and toward the right as he snapped photos." The first shots from a higher location - which should give us more perspective beyond the guard rail - i.e. a pole. The gov. cars that blocked traffic are not there yet, and they are supposed to be the ones that helped him take the pole out of his windshield - so why isn't it still sticking out of the windshield?



Hmmm. Nobody does, but, based on ??? you do - FL77 hit it. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/drunk.gif" alt="" />