Job security....

The concepts exceed the 15 second or less attention span of most people....

It's sad when the Daily Show breaks it all down the best. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />

Richard Gage on Fresno, CA Fox 26 May 27th

I've seen videos that contradict that dude on everything he's saying...just saying. Somebody's wrong/lying, that's for sure.

Who gains by lying? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

The only vid you need is one of the building collapsing, and then review the law of conservation of momentum.

freefall speeds would be around 10 seconds, they took longer than that to fall. Stop pushing that idea when its flawed. Are you going to start talking like Jesse Ventura and say they used Thermite paint? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/butwiggle.gif" alt="" />

Hmmmm - tell me. How long did it take for them to fall?

<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/sleeping.gif" alt="" /> ...

NIST says WTC1 fell in 11 seconds and WTC2 in 9 seconds...as well as the 9-11 Ommission.

So what exactly about "about 10 seconds" is 11 and 9 seconds not 'about' "near freefall speeds"?

<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />

I am not a physicist at all, and nor are you at least from what I know. We are both google searching these subjects as we argue. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> But I was watching a show on the History channel about after people are gone. Two had building collapses explaining that the buildings collapsing from structural failures from halfway up or greater are collapsing becoming greater in mass and weight pancaking and putting more weight on the next floor breaking it faster and faster all the way down.

Also, here is a forum that might better explain it than me. Link

I am trying my ass off to find sources that aren't biased one way or the other. Try it sometime. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />

LOL - the infamous NOVA episode - where it shows the pancaking layers (THEORY which NIST later discounted)...with the core columns still standing. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />

NOVA

You may be googling but I've done my research. Coming to a conclusion doesn't denote bias. One conclusion favors the official story even in spite of its own contradictory claims and obfuscation and ommission of facts, and the other says the evidence leaves only one scenario possible.

Al quaeda didn't order NORAD to stand down - or are you willing to believe things even the 9-11 commission won't capitulate to?

Believe what you will. .... good boy <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />