|
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
[Re: Snowtoy]
#918217
12/04/08 12:53 AM
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,768
Trail Leader
|
I have been seeing stories about us pulling some troops out of the middle east, and should be pulling the majority out in a few years...I don't think having 20,000 troops patroling our streets would be a problem...it would be like having a larger police force....hey if the govt. is going to pay them for their service, and there is not a need for them over seas...
Now I am not saying that they should have all the powers of police, like handing out tickets and what not, but to have them aid police in large events such as large sporting events (cities that have teams in a Super Bowl or World Series), concerts, etc. would not be a bad idea.
It could be worse...just imagine a country the size of Iraq with as many soldiers as are there now. Heck, Texas is almost 100,000 sq miles larger than Iraq.
Just my 2ó The problem with this is that combat trained individuals aren't a policing force, they do not react the same to the same level of violence, because they aren't trained to. When having military personnel perform police duties, you almost always end up with problems. Exactly. That and the fact that control over that force is entirely under the Federal government instead of the state and local governments. This point gets lost in a lot of discussions, but the founders specificly wanted to limit the power of the Federal government because they knew it would the hardest form of government for the people to control and it would represent the interest of the people the least. While the local governments are elected by and controlled by fewer individuals, giving individuals better control over their government and their destiny. On some level, the FBI shouldn't even really exist, but at least the FBI is generally limited to investigating specificly Federal and interstate crimes that transcent local juristicans. The problem with this plan is that it involves or at least potentially involves federal military troops patrolling streets and quelling American social unrest and generally doing the job that should be done exclusively by local police. If we need more police, then we should be hiring more police. Not using the military. Another thing. I've heard that each state's National Guard unit already has a full time anti-terror/nuclear unit specificly for those extreme situations. If true, then it further prove this federalization of our local police is not needed.
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
stony-man
|
12/01/08 09:47 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
kewlynx
|
12/02/08 03:25 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
bretwalda
|
12/02/08 04:33 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
kewlynx
|
12/02/08 04:41 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
bretwalda
|
12/02/08 05:24 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Snowtoy
|
12/02/08 05:59 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
bretwalda
|
12/02/08 09:16 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
kewlynx
|
12/02/08 12:36 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
cmonty72
|
12/02/08 06:22 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
bretwalda
|
12/02/08 07:19 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Hiker
|
12/02/08 07:08 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
stony-man
|
12/02/08 07:14 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Brian894X4
|
12/02/08 10:33 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
StockRaider
|
12/02/08 11:26 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Snowtoy
|
12/03/08 08:39 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Brian894X4
|
12/03/08 01:08 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Brown81CJ5
|
12/03/08 07:11 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
stony-man
|
12/03/08 10:01 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Snowtoy
|
12/03/08 10:23 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Brian894X4
|
12/04/08 12:53 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Snowtoy
|
12/03/08 10:19 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Grasscat
|
12/04/08 01:38 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
kewlynx
|
12/04/08 04:27 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
StockRaider
|
12/04/08 07:00 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
stony-man
|
12/04/08 07:02 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Brian894X4
|
12/04/08 10:28 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Brown81CJ5
|
12/04/08 02:49 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
bretwalda
|
12/04/08 08:54 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
cmonty72
|
12/04/08 05:47 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
NathanC
|
12/05/08 04:39 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
kewlynx
|
12/05/08 06:12 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
cmonty72
|
12/05/08 07:19 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
kewlynx
|
12/05/08 08:10 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Brian894X4
|
12/05/08 09:06 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
bretwalda
|
12/05/08 05:29 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
cmonty72
|
12/05/08 05:51 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Brian894X4
|
12/05/08 07:03 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
cmonty72
|
12/05/08 08:37 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
bretwalda
|
12/05/08 09:13 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
cmonty72
|
12/06/08 05:14 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
bretwalda
|
12/16/08 06:55 AM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Brown81CJ5
|
12/16/08 04:38 PM
|
Re: 20,000 troops deploy, HERE
|
Snowtoy
|
12/04/08 10:45 PM
|
|
|